Reportstack, provider of premium market research reports announces the addition of China Wire and Cable Industry Report, 2011 market report to its offering
China is the world’s biggest wire and cable manufacturer, with the largest industrial output value. In 2003-2010, its operating revenue of China’s wire and cable industry grew at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 30.6%, towering over the global level; from January to September 2011, the operating revenue increased by 30.9% YoY to RMB767.5 billion.
During the 12th Five-Year Plan period (2011-2015), China’s investment in ultra high voltage (UHV) and rural power grid will reach up to RMB540 billion and RMB200 billion respectively. Following the expanded investment in power grid, the power cable industry will usher in a new round of development opportunities. In China, major enterprises in the high voltage (HV) and extra high voltage (EHV) power cable industry include Baosheng Science & Technology, Qingdao Hanhe Cable and Shenyang Furukawa Cable.
The development of telecommunication industry has provided constant impetus for China’s optical fiber cable construction, with the accumulated cable length increasing from 2.71 billion meters in 2003 to 9.95 billion meters in 2010 at a CAGR of 20.4%. Larger-scale manufacturers include Yangtze Optical Fibre and Cable, Fiberhome Telecommunication, Heng Tong Group, Zhongli S&T, etc.
In 2010, China’s automotive wiring harness market scale reached RMB82.2 billion, mainly occupied by Japanese and South Korean multinational corporations, of which, Japanese enterprises took over 60% market share. Major automotive wiring harness manufacturers in China include Shanghai-based Delphi Packard Electric System, Huizhou Zhurun Wiring Systems, Hangzhou Yazaki Parts, THB Group, etc.
China Wire and Cable Industry Report, 2011 highlights:
※Global and China Wire and Cable Industry Development, including market scale, competition characteristics and pattern, China wire and cable industry by region, import and export, development trend, and so on;
※Key Market Segments of China Wire and Cable Industry, referring to market scale, demand, major enterprises, etc. of three market segments, i.e., power cable, communication cable & optical fiber cable, and automotive wiring harness;
※Research on Global and China Key Wire & Cable Manufacturers, covering operation and development strategies of four multinational corporations including Nexans and 16 Chinese enterprises such as Qingdao Hanhe Cable.
Nexans is a French wire & cable manufacturer, with products mainly applied in infrastructure, construction industry and local area network (LAN). In 2011, Nexans acquired the power cable business of Shandong Yanggu Electric Cable Group Co., Ltd. and developed 500kV EHV cable products, marching towards China’s high-end power cable market.
Far East Holding Group is the largest wire and cable enterprise in China. In July 2011, it raised RMB1.15 billion, mainly invested in projects including Smart Grid EHV Cable, New-energy Special Cable, and High-strength Energy-saving Environment-friendly Special Wire.
Browse China market research reports at http://www.reportstack.com/countries/index/3/china-market-research-reports.html
Contact us:
Reportstack http://www.reportstack.com/contact
twitter: http://twitter.com/reportstack
facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Reportstack/182382778485635
linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/company/reportstack
Friday, 13 January 2012
China Sewage Treatment Equipment Market Report, 2011-2012
Reportstack, provider of premium market research reports announces the addition of China Sewage Treatment Equipment Market Report, 2011-2012 market report to its offering
With the deepening of industrialization and urbanization in China, the investment in sewage treatment field will keep sustained growth in China, but the short-term investment growth rate presents a downward trend. In 2010, the investments into Chinese sewage treatment industry footed up to RMB86 billion, up 26% from a year earlier, yet with lower investment growth rate than that in 2009. In 2011, investment growth rate falls to 15% or so, and then in 2013 it will recover to 18%.
Against the field of industrial sewage treatment, domestic sewage treatment is a sector invested by the Government, with strong rigid investment; therefore, the demand for domestic sewage equipment will remain stable in 2011 and 2012. Under economic downturn, most companies may postpone the renovation of their sewage treatment systems; and the demand for industrial sewage treatment equipment will decrease in 2012, but it will rebound from 2013 to 2015.
By analyzing sewage treatment technologies and projects, the report not only expounds the development status quo of Chinese sewage treatment equipment market, film processing equipment (MBR, Membrane Bioreactor) market and sludge treatment equipment market, but also estimates the demand in Chinese sewage equipment industry and delivers investment advices. Moreover, the report analytically elaborates sewage equipment companies.
Beijing Originwater Technology Co., Ltd. is engaged in membrane materials & equipment manufacturing and process development in the fields of sewage resourcization and drinking water security. Originwater's development model is presented as follows: through transferring the holding rights of local sewage treatment projects, it cooperates with local governments to set up joint ventures and becomes a water treatment technical supporter and equipment provider of the local governments.
Hangzhou Xingyuan Filter Technology Co., Ltd. is primarily focused on the development, manufacture and sales of pressure filters. The company can produce 1,300 sets of pressure filters, including 100 large ones and 500 medium-sized ones. It is presently constructing the 800-unit large and medium-sized membrane pressure filter production line project and a technology R&D center project. Pressure filter can be used in sludge drying process. The company was once involved in sludge drying process projects of Shougang Group and Xiamen Water Group.
Wuxi Huaguang Boiler Co., Ltd. mainly produces circulating fluidized boilers, pulverized coal boilers and special boilers. Sludge incineration mainly makes use of circulating fluidized bed incinerators which have been in the main produced in China. The circulating fluidized-bed incinerators produced by most companies find general application in garbage incineration, only Wuxi Huaguang and a few others set foot in sludge incineration. In H1 2011, Wuxi Huaguang generated operating revenue of RMB1.01 billion from circulating fluidized bed boilers, up 25.88 % year-on-year and sharing 57% of total revenue; its gross margin was 15.18%.
Browse China market research reports at http://www.reportstack.com/countries/index/3/china-market-research-reports.html
Contact us:
Reportstack http://www.reportstack.com/contact
twitter: http://twitter.com/reportstack
facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Reportstack/182382778485635
linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/company/reportstack
With the deepening of industrialization and urbanization in China, the investment in sewage treatment field will keep sustained growth in China, but the short-term investment growth rate presents a downward trend. In 2010, the investments into Chinese sewage treatment industry footed up to RMB86 billion, up 26% from a year earlier, yet with lower investment growth rate than that in 2009. In 2011, investment growth rate falls to 15% or so, and then in 2013 it will recover to 18%.
Against the field of industrial sewage treatment, domestic sewage treatment is a sector invested by the Government, with strong rigid investment; therefore, the demand for domestic sewage equipment will remain stable in 2011 and 2012. Under economic downturn, most companies may postpone the renovation of their sewage treatment systems; and the demand for industrial sewage treatment equipment will decrease in 2012, but it will rebound from 2013 to 2015.
By analyzing sewage treatment technologies and projects, the report not only expounds the development status quo of Chinese sewage treatment equipment market, film processing equipment (MBR, Membrane Bioreactor) market and sludge treatment equipment market, but also estimates the demand in Chinese sewage equipment industry and delivers investment advices. Moreover, the report analytically elaborates sewage equipment companies.
Beijing Originwater Technology Co., Ltd. is engaged in membrane materials & equipment manufacturing and process development in the fields of sewage resourcization and drinking water security. Originwater's development model is presented as follows: through transferring the holding rights of local sewage treatment projects, it cooperates with local governments to set up joint ventures and becomes a water treatment technical supporter and equipment provider of the local governments.
Hangzhou Xingyuan Filter Technology Co., Ltd. is primarily focused on the development, manufacture and sales of pressure filters. The company can produce 1,300 sets of pressure filters, including 100 large ones and 500 medium-sized ones. It is presently constructing the 800-unit large and medium-sized membrane pressure filter production line project and a technology R&D center project. Pressure filter can be used in sludge drying process. The company was once involved in sludge drying process projects of Shougang Group and Xiamen Water Group.
Wuxi Huaguang Boiler Co., Ltd. mainly produces circulating fluidized boilers, pulverized coal boilers and special boilers. Sludge incineration mainly makes use of circulating fluidized bed incinerators which have been in the main produced in China. The circulating fluidized-bed incinerators produced by most companies find general application in garbage incineration, only Wuxi Huaguang and a few others set foot in sludge incineration. In H1 2011, Wuxi Huaguang generated operating revenue of RMB1.01 billion from circulating fluidized bed boilers, up 25.88 % year-on-year and sharing 57% of total revenue; its gross margin was 15.18%.
Browse China market research reports at http://www.reportstack.com/countries/index/3/china-market-research-reports.html
Contact us:
Reportstack http://www.reportstack.com/contact
twitter: http://twitter.com/reportstack
facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Reportstack/182382778485635
linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/company/reportstack
Global and China Offshore Rig Industry Report, 2011
Reportstack, provider of premium market research reports announces the addition of Global and China Offshore Rig Industry Report, 2011 market report to its offering
Offshore rig can be divided into 8 categories, i.e., drill barge, drillship, inland barge, jack-up, platform rig, semisub, submersible and tender. As of Dec.15, 2011, there had been 48 drill barges, 73 drillships, 74 inland barges, 491 jack-ups, 250 platform rigs, 210 semisubs, 5 submersibles and 40 tenders.
Drillship, jack-up and semisub are the most common. As of Dec.15, 2011, there had been 54 drillships under construction, with the unit price of USD550 million - 650 million; 67 jack-ups under construction, with the unit price of USD140 million -230 million; 16 semisubs under construction, with a large price range. The rigs in harsh waters (such as South China Sea, Gulf of Mexico, North Sea) are expensive, for instance, China's "Offshore Oil 981" costs USD950 million; while a rig working in peaceful waters (such as the waters in West Africa) just values USD150 million.
Undoubtedly, drillships take a lion’s share, 55%, in the offshore rig market. Drillships are mainly used in the waters with the depth of more than 3,000 feet. Currently, most of the drillships under construction have the rated water depth of 10,000-12,000 feet, and their maximum drilling depth is generally 35,000-40,000 feet. The drillship Sedco No.445 designed by Earl & Wright in 1971, built by Japan's Mitsui and managed by Sedco is the world's first drillship, with the largest rated water depth of 7,200 feet. As yet, the drillship is still at work, but it is rendered to detect seabed mineral resources, rather than drilling.
Most of drillships before 2000 were built when the oil crisis occurred. At present, only about 20 drillships of them are still working, most of which were built by Japanese and European manufacturers. After 2000, the human being endeavors to explore oil and gas resources in deep waters, which generates soaring demand for drillships. South Korean builders almost monopolize the market; Samsung Heavy Industries is building 20 drillships, DSME 10 units and Hyundai Heavy Industries 11 units. Brazil's EAS is building 7 drillships. EAS is a joint venture co-funded by Samsung Heavy Industries, Queiroz Galvao and Camargo Correa. Dalian Subsidiary of South Korea's STX is building 2 drillships now.
The drillship built by COSCO Shipyard for Dalian Deepwater Developer is China's first drillship, with the maximum drilling depth of 30,000 feet. CSSC's Shanghai Shipyard is building 2 drillships now, with the designed rated water depth of merely 3,000 feet.
The operation of drilling rigs is risky. The Gulf of Mexico oil spill made BP have to pay tens of billions of dollars. For the operation of drilling rigs, the requirements on operators are very high; particularly in harsh seas and deep waters, and the requirements on the qualification of the staff are strict. This is why most of drilling rigs are not operated by oil giants, but by veteran operators. High risks and threshold bring high returns. The operating margin of drilling rig operators is almost never less than 30%, even 40% or more is common. These operators do not care about the short-term ups and downs of oil prices, and they are making long-term (5-10 years) plans. Even in the economic downturn, they dare to conduct large-scale investment.
Browse China market research reports at http://www.reportstack.com/countries/index/3/china-market-research-reports.html
Contact us:
Reportstack http://www.reportstack.com/contact
twitter: http://twitter.com/reportstack
facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Reportstack/182382778485635
linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/company/reportstack
Offshore rig can be divided into 8 categories, i.e., drill barge, drillship, inland barge, jack-up, platform rig, semisub, submersible and tender. As of Dec.15, 2011, there had been 48 drill barges, 73 drillships, 74 inland barges, 491 jack-ups, 250 platform rigs, 210 semisubs, 5 submersibles and 40 tenders.
Drillship, jack-up and semisub are the most common. As of Dec.15, 2011, there had been 54 drillships under construction, with the unit price of USD550 million - 650 million; 67 jack-ups under construction, with the unit price of USD140 million -230 million; 16 semisubs under construction, with a large price range. The rigs in harsh waters (such as South China Sea, Gulf of Mexico, North Sea) are expensive, for instance, China's "Offshore Oil 981" costs USD950 million; while a rig working in peaceful waters (such as the waters in West Africa) just values USD150 million.
Undoubtedly, drillships take a lion’s share, 55%, in the offshore rig market. Drillships are mainly used in the waters with the depth of more than 3,000 feet. Currently, most of the drillships under construction have the rated water depth of 10,000-12,000 feet, and their maximum drilling depth is generally 35,000-40,000 feet. The drillship Sedco No.445 designed by Earl & Wright in 1971, built by Japan's Mitsui and managed by Sedco is the world's first drillship, with the largest rated water depth of 7,200 feet. As yet, the drillship is still at work, but it is rendered to detect seabed mineral resources, rather than drilling.
Most of drillships before 2000 were built when the oil crisis occurred. At present, only about 20 drillships of them are still working, most of which were built by Japanese and European manufacturers. After 2000, the human being endeavors to explore oil and gas resources in deep waters, which generates soaring demand for drillships. South Korean builders almost monopolize the market; Samsung Heavy Industries is building 20 drillships, DSME 10 units and Hyundai Heavy Industries 11 units. Brazil's EAS is building 7 drillships. EAS is a joint venture co-funded by Samsung Heavy Industries, Queiroz Galvao and Camargo Correa. Dalian Subsidiary of South Korea's STX is building 2 drillships now.
The drillship built by COSCO Shipyard for Dalian Deepwater Developer is China's first drillship, with the maximum drilling depth of 30,000 feet. CSSC's Shanghai Shipyard is building 2 drillships now, with the designed rated water depth of merely 3,000 feet.
The operation of drilling rigs is risky. The Gulf of Mexico oil spill made BP have to pay tens of billions of dollars. For the operation of drilling rigs, the requirements on operators are very high; particularly in harsh seas and deep waters, and the requirements on the qualification of the staff are strict. This is why most of drilling rigs are not operated by oil giants, but by veteran operators. High risks and threshold bring high returns. The operating margin of drilling rig operators is almost never less than 30%, even 40% or more is common. These operators do not care about the short-term ups and downs of oil prices, and they are making long-term (5-10 years) plans. Even in the economic downturn, they dare to conduct large-scale investment.
Browse China market research reports at http://www.reportstack.com/countries/index/3/china-market-research-reports.html
Contact us:
Reportstack http://www.reportstack.com/contact
twitter: http://twitter.com/reportstack
facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Reportstack/182382778485635
linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/company/reportstack
Global and China FPSO Industry Report, 2011
Reportstack, provider of premium market research reports announces the addition of Global and China FPSO Industry Report, 2011 market report to its offering
Offshore engineering equipment consists of exploration equipment, drilling facility, production equipment and auxiliary equipment. Production platforms include fixed platforms and floating platforms, and the latter are the mainstream in the current market, mainly including tension-leg platform (TLP), spar platform (SPAR), semi-submersible platform (SEMI) and floating production, storage and offloading equipment (FPSO).
With respect to the number of floating production platforms, FPSO accounts for approximately 60%, ranking first, followed by SEMI, TLP and SPAR. SEMI is mainly applied in the North Sea and South American waters, while TLP and SPAR are mostly located in Gulf of Mexico (GOM). FPSO is likely to be the most promising one in the future.
As of December 1, 2011, there are 187 FPSOs in operation around the world, of which 108 FPSOs are run by operators and the rest 79 FPSOs are operated by petroleum companies. The number of FPSOs in West African waters hits 44, ranking No. 1, and that in South American waters, British and Chinese waters reaches 39, 17 and 17, respectively. Moreover, 16 FPSOs are situated in Australian waters, 9 FPSOs in Vietnamese waters and 8 FPSOs in Indonesian and Norwegian waters separately. Around 60% of FPSOs are conversions, and 40% are newly-built ones.
Among large petroleum companies, Petrobras possesses 16 FPSOs, ranking No. 1, and has ordered another 8 FPSOs. From 2012 to 2015, Petrobras will launch 17 FPSOs into operation. CNOOC now owns 14 FPSOs and does not plan to add any more recently. CNOOC is still at the infancy stage of deep-sea oil exploration and development. French Total has 6 FPSOs, 5 of which are located in West African waters, and the company plans to add 5 FPSOs by 2017 in West African waters. The petroleum companies in USA are mainly engaged in GOM and onshore oil field projects. SHELL focuses on the LNG area, has poured USD5 billion into building the world’s first LNG-FPSO and shown little interest in ordinary FPSO.
Floating production platforms are principally centralized in the waters of West Africa, South America, Southeast Asia and Australia, GOM and the North Sea. And those in West African waters are mainly centered in Nigeria, Angola, Equatorial Guinea and Congo. Among these four countries, Angola has witnessed the fastest development due to its political stability, while in other three countries, the political unrest has promoted the replacement of fixed platforms and oil pipelines by FPSOs, because fixed platforms and oil pipelines are extremely vulnerable to sabotage while FPSO features high safety factor, small investment and quick economic returns.
The South American waters are mainly controlled by government-owned Petrobras. The Brazilian government hopes that local enterprises will become the biggest beneficiaries of offshore oil exploitation. In 2009, Petrobras invited bidding for 8 FPSOs, and 5 groups of manufacturers were involved in the bidding. The bidders included Keppel, the world’s largest FPSO conversion enterprise, SBM Offshore, the world’s largest FPSO operator and Hyundai Heavy Industries, the world’s largest shipbuilder. All these enterprises formed alliance with Brazilian companies, but they were too powerful to be chosen by the Brazilian government. Finally, the alliance of Swedish GVA and Brazilian Engevix won the bid which totaled USD3.46 billion. GVA was chosen because it’s just a design company.
Because of the harsh environment conditions of GOM, TLP and SPAR become the best option and TLP is generally adopted. The North Sea is similar to GOM in environment, and SEMI is mostly employed, for the development of oil field may not last long. In the sea waters of Southeast Asia and Australia, Indonesia and Vietnam, especially the latter, show strong willingness in the exploitation of oil resource, while more natural gas fields are in northwest Australian waters. Arctic waters also have great potential and will be the paradise for FPSO because of its harsh environment.
Approximately 60% of FPSOs are converted from oil tankers. Generally speaking, the oil fields which can be explored for more than 20 years will tend to be equipped with new FPSOs, while the oil fields which can be exploited for less than 15 years tend to opt for converted tankers. A newly-built FPSO costs around USD300-500 million, while a converted tanker costs USD50-200 million. In order to prevent large single-hull tankers from polluting the environment in case of shipwreck, IMO decided to advance the implementation of the phase-out scheme for single hull tankers proposed in December 2003 from 2015 to 2010. FPSO offers an opportunity for the revival of single-hull tankers.
Such factors as vessel size, age and structure are essential in the FPSO conversion. The tanker built before 1990 is backward in technology and is inappropriate to be converted into FSPO. FPSO develops towards ultra-large capacity, especially in West African waters, where only the tanker with a capacity of 250,000 DWT or above is proper to be converted into FPSO.
FPSO operators mostly start up and thrive from tanker or LNG transportation business and have a huge number of fleets. BW Offshore, MODEC, TEEKAY, SBM Offshore, Maersk and Fred. Olsen are such operators. With extensive experience in offshore production, these enterprises cannot be replaced by large petroleum companies, and are able to enjoy rich profits, with EBITDA margin generally surpassing 35%
Browse China market research reports at http://www.reportstack.com/countries/index/3/china-market-research-reports.html
Contact us:
Reportstack http://www.reportstack.com/contact
twitter: http://twitter.com/reportstack
facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Reportstack/182382778485635
linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/company/reportstack
Offshore engineering equipment consists of exploration equipment, drilling facility, production equipment and auxiliary equipment. Production platforms include fixed platforms and floating platforms, and the latter are the mainstream in the current market, mainly including tension-leg platform (TLP), spar platform (SPAR), semi-submersible platform (SEMI) and floating production, storage and offloading equipment (FPSO).
With respect to the number of floating production platforms, FPSO accounts for approximately 60%, ranking first, followed by SEMI, TLP and SPAR. SEMI is mainly applied in the North Sea and South American waters, while TLP and SPAR are mostly located in Gulf of Mexico (GOM). FPSO is likely to be the most promising one in the future.
As of December 1, 2011, there are 187 FPSOs in operation around the world, of which 108 FPSOs are run by operators and the rest 79 FPSOs are operated by petroleum companies. The number of FPSOs in West African waters hits 44, ranking No. 1, and that in South American waters, British and Chinese waters reaches 39, 17 and 17, respectively. Moreover, 16 FPSOs are situated in Australian waters, 9 FPSOs in Vietnamese waters and 8 FPSOs in Indonesian and Norwegian waters separately. Around 60% of FPSOs are conversions, and 40% are newly-built ones.
Among large petroleum companies, Petrobras possesses 16 FPSOs, ranking No. 1, and has ordered another 8 FPSOs. From 2012 to 2015, Petrobras will launch 17 FPSOs into operation. CNOOC now owns 14 FPSOs and does not plan to add any more recently. CNOOC is still at the infancy stage of deep-sea oil exploration and development. French Total has 6 FPSOs, 5 of which are located in West African waters, and the company plans to add 5 FPSOs by 2017 in West African waters. The petroleum companies in USA are mainly engaged in GOM and onshore oil field projects. SHELL focuses on the LNG area, has poured USD5 billion into building the world’s first LNG-FPSO and shown little interest in ordinary FPSO.
Floating production platforms are principally centralized in the waters of West Africa, South America, Southeast Asia and Australia, GOM and the North Sea. And those in West African waters are mainly centered in Nigeria, Angola, Equatorial Guinea and Congo. Among these four countries, Angola has witnessed the fastest development due to its political stability, while in other three countries, the political unrest has promoted the replacement of fixed platforms and oil pipelines by FPSOs, because fixed platforms and oil pipelines are extremely vulnerable to sabotage while FPSO features high safety factor, small investment and quick economic returns.
The South American waters are mainly controlled by government-owned Petrobras. The Brazilian government hopes that local enterprises will become the biggest beneficiaries of offshore oil exploitation. In 2009, Petrobras invited bidding for 8 FPSOs, and 5 groups of manufacturers were involved in the bidding. The bidders included Keppel, the world’s largest FPSO conversion enterprise, SBM Offshore, the world’s largest FPSO operator and Hyundai Heavy Industries, the world’s largest shipbuilder. All these enterprises formed alliance with Brazilian companies, but they were too powerful to be chosen by the Brazilian government. Finally, the alliance of Swedish GVA and Brazilian Engevix won the bid which totaled USD3.46 billion. GVA was chosen because it’s just a design company.
Because of the harsh environment conditions of GOM, TLP and SPAR become the best option and TLP is generally adopted. The North Sea is similar to GOM in environment, and SEMI is mostly employed, for the development of oil field may not last long. In the sea waters of Southeast Asia and Australia, Indonesia and Vietnam, especially the latter, show strong willingness in the exploitation of oil resource, while more natural gas fields are in northwest Australian waters. Arctic waters also have great potential and will be the paradise for FPSO because of its harsh environment.
Approximately 60% of FPSOs are converted from oil tankers. Generally speaking, the oil fields which can be explored for more than 20 years will tend to be equipped with new FPSOs, while the oil fields which can be exploited for less than 15 years tend to opt for converted tankers. A newly-built FPSO costs around USD300-500 million, while a converted tanker costs USD50-200 million. In order to prevent large single-hull tankers from polluting the environment in case of shipwreck, IMO decided to advance the implementation of the phase-out scheme for single hull tankers proposed in December 2003 from 2015 to 2010. FPSO offers an opportunity for the revival of single-hull tankers.
Such factors as vessel size, age and structure are essential in the FPSO conversion. The tanker built before 1990 is backward in technology and is inappropriate to be converted into FSPO. FPSO develops towards ultra-large capacity, especially in West African waters, where only the tanker with a capacity of 250,000 DWT or above is proper to be converted into FPSO.
FPSO operators mostly start up and thrive from tanker or LNG transportation business and have a huge number of fleets. BW Offshore, MODEC, TEEKAY, SBM Offshore, Maersk and Fred. Olsen are such operators. With extensive experience in offshore production, these enterprises cannot be replaced by large petroleum companies, and are able to enjoy rich profits, with EBITDA margin generally surpassing 35%
Browse China market research reports at http://www.reportstack.com/countries/index/3/china-market-research-reports.html
Contact us:
Reportstack http://www.reportstack.com/contact
twitter: http://twitter.com/reportstack
facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Reportstack/182382778485635
linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/company/reportstack
Thursday, 12 January 2012
2012 Deep Research Report on Global and China Hemodialysis Machine Industry
Reportstack, provider of premium market research reports announces the addition of 2012 Deep Research Report on Global and China Hemodialysis Machine Industry market report to its offering
2012 Deep Research Report on Global and China Hemodialysis Machine Industry>was published by QYResearch Medical Equipment Research Center on Jan 2012. It was a professional and depth research report on Global and China Hemodialysis Machine Industry. Firstly the report describes the background knowledge of Hemodialysis Machine (single pump double pumo bedside), including Concepts Classification Manufacturing process technical parameters etc; then statistics International 11 and China 3 Manufacturers Hemodialysis Machine product Capacity production cost price production value profit margins and other relevant data, statistics these enterprises Hemodialysis Machine products, customers, raw materials, company background information, then summary statistics and analysis the relevant data on these enterprises. The report got Global and China Hemodialysis Machine companies production market share, Global and China Hemodialysis Machine demand supply and shortage, Global and China Hemodialysis Machine 2009 -2016 production price cost profit production value profit margins, etc. At the same time, the report analyzed and discussed supply and demand changes in Hemodialysis Machine market and business development strategies, conduct a comprehensive analysis on Global and China Hemodialysis Machine industry trends. Finally, the report also introduced 2000 sets/year Hemodialysis Machine project Feasibility analysis and related research conclusions.
Browse China market research reports at http://www.reportstack.com/countries/index/3/china-market-research-reports.html
Contact us:
Reportstack http://www.reportstack.com/contact
twitter: http://twitter.com/reportstack
facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Reportstack/182382778485635
linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/company/reportstack
2012 Deep Research Report on Global and China Hemodialysis Machine Industry>was published by QYResearch Medical Equipment Research Center on Jan 2012. It was a professional and depth research report on Global and China Hemodialysis Machine Industry. Firstly the report describes the background knowledge of Hemodialysis Machine (single pump double pumo bedside), including Concepts Classification Manufacturing process technical parameters etc; then statistics International 11 and China 3 Manufacturers Hemodialysis Machine product Capacity production cost price production value profit margins and other relevant data, statistics these enterprises Hemodialysis Machine products, customers, raw materials, company background information, then summary statistics and analysis the relevant data on these enterprises. The report got Global and China Hemodialysis Machine companies production market share, Global and China Hemodialysis Machine demand supply and shortage, Global and China Hemodialysis Machine 2009 -2016 production price cost profit production value profit margins, etc. At the same time, the report analyzed and discussed supply and demand changes in Hemodialysis Machine market and business development strategies, conduct a comprehensive analysis on Global and China Hemodialysis Machine industry trends. Finally, the report also introduced 2000 sets/year Hemodialysis Machine project Feasibility analysis and related research conclusions.
Browse China market research reports at http://www.reportstack.com/countries/index/3/china-market-research-reports.html
Contact us:
Reportstack http://www.reportstack.com/contact
twitter: http://twitter.com/reportstack
facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Reportstack/182382778485635
linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/company/reportstack
Friday, 6 January 2012
The Saudi Arabian Defense Industry Market Opportunities and Entry Strategies, Analyses and Forecasts to 2016
Reportstack, provider of premium market research reports announces the addition of The Saudi Arabian Defense Industry ? Market Opportunities and Entry Strategies, Analyses and Forecasts to 2016 market report to its offering
Contact us:
Reportstack http://www.reportstack.com/contact
twitter: http://twitter.com/reportstack
facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Reportstack/182382778485635
linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/company/reportstack
The Saudi Arabian defense industry valued US$48 billion in 2011 and is one of the largest defense markets globally. During the review period, the country's defense expenditure grew at a CAGR of 7.83%, and is expected to record a CAGR of 5.44 % over the forecast period, to value US$62.4 billion by 2016. The key drivers of such expenditure growth include increases in cross-border insurgency, domestic unease with the ruling regime, the rising number of Al Qaeda training camps in the country, an increasing focus on infrastructure security regarding oil and a regional rivalry with Iran to emerge as the most influential nation in the Middle East. Saudi Arabia's substantial defense budget, coupled with the limited capabilities of domestic defense firms, is attracting foreign OEMs into the market.
Report Summary
This report offers insights into market opportunities and entry strategies adopted by foreign OEMs to gain a market share in Saudi Arabia. In particular, it offers in-depth analysis of the following:
• Market opportunity and attractiveness: Detailed analysis of the current market size and growth expectations during 2011-2016, including highlights of the key drivers, to aid understanding of the growth dynamics. It also benchmarks the sector against key global markets and provides detailed understanding of emerging opportunities in specific areas.
• Procurement dynamics: Trend analysis of imports and exports, along with their implications and impact on the Saudi Arabian industry. Industry structure: Five forces analysis to identify various power centers in the Saudi Arabian industry and how these are likely to develop in the future.
• Market entry strategy: Analysis of possible ways to enter the market, along with knowledge of how existing companies have entered the market, including key contracts, alliances, and strategic initiatives.
• Competitive landscape and strategic insights: Analysis of the competitive landscape of defense manufacturers in Saudi Arabia. It provides an overview of the key defense companies (both domestic and foreign) along with insights such as key alliances, strategic initiatives and a brief financial analysis.
• Business environment and country risk: A range of drivers at country level, assessing business environment and country risk. It covers historical and forecast values for a range of indicators evaluating business confidence, economic performance, infrastructure quality and availability, labor force, demographics, and political and social risk.
Report Scope
• Analysis of defense industry market size from 2005 through 2010 and forecasts till 2016
• Analysis of defense budget allocation
• Benchmarking with key global markets
• Market opportunities
• Defense procurement dynamics
• Industry dynamics
• Market entry strategy
• Competitive landscape and strategic insights
• Business environment and country risk
Reasons To Buy
• Gain insight into the Saudi Arabian defense industry with current, historic and forecast market values
• Gain insight into market opportunity and attractiveness
• Gain insight into industry procurement dynamics
• Gain insight into industry structure
• Gain insight into the regulations governing the Saudi Arabian defense industry and the potential market entry strategies with an expert analysis of the competitive structure
• Identify top companies of the Saudi Arabian defense industry along with profiles of all those companies
Contact us:
Reportstack http://www.reportstack.com/contact
twitter: http://twitter.com/reportstack
facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Reportstack/182382778485635
linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/company/reportstack
The Greek Defense Industry Market Opportunities and Entry Strategies, Analyses and Forecasts to 2016
Reportstack, provider of premium market research reports announces the addition of The Greek Defense Industry ? Market Opportunities and Entry Strategies, Analyses and Forecasts to 2016 market report to its offering
Contact us:
Reportstack http://www.reportstack.com/contact
twitter: http://twitter.com/reportstack
facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Reportstack/182382778485635
linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/company/reportstack
Greece and Turkey not only share a long-standing territorial dispute involving Cyprus, but are also engaged in a maritime border dispute in the Gulf of Aegean. The situation has nearly escalated to an armed conflict twice, and is historically the driving factor behind Greek defense procurements. The country's lack of domestic defense capabilities and the extensive capabilities of the Turkish military have driven Greece to procure sophisticated defense systems from foreign OEMs in order to strengthen the country's strategic assets and protect critical infrastructure. During 2007-2011, Greece accounted for 4% of global arms imports, making it the fifth-largest arms importer globally.
As a percentage of GDP, the country is expected to reduce its defense expenditure over the forecast period, from the 2011 level of 2.0%, to 1.9% by 2016. The total defense expenditure for the forecast period is projected to values US$31.7 billion, and in accordance with its commitment to the protection of civilians and critical infrastructure, Greece is expected to allocate an average per capita defense expenditure of US$564.4. Over the forecast period arms procurement is forecast to value US$8.8 billion, which corresponds to 28% of the country's total defense expenditure for the same period. The remaining 72% is forecast to be invested in the training of the Hellenic Armed Forces, the MRO activities of existing defense systems and the salaries and pensions of military personnel.
Report Summary
This report offers insights into market opportunities and entry strategies adopted by foreign OEMs to gain a market share in the Greek defense industry. In particular, it offers in-depth analysis of the following:
• Market opportunity and attractiveness: Detailed analysis of the current market size and growth expectations during 2010-2016, including highlights of the key drivers, to aid understanding of the growth dynamics. It also benchmarks the sector against key global markets and provides detailed understanding of emerging opportunities in specific areas.
• Procurement dynamics: Trend analysis of imports and exports, along with their implications and impact on the Greek defense industry.
• Industry structure: Five forces analysis to identify various power centers in the industry and how these are likely to develop in the future.
• Market entry strategy: Analysis of possible ways to enter the market, along with knowledge of how existing companies have entered the market, including key contracts, alliances, and strategic initiatives.
• Competitive landscape and strategic insights: Analysis of the competitive landscape of defense manufacturers in Greece. It provides an overview of the key defense companies (both domestic and foreign) along with insights such as key alliances, strategic initiatives and a brief financial analysis.
• Business environment and country risk: A range of drivers at country level, assessing business environment and country risk. It covers historical and forecast values for a range of indicators evaluating business confidence, economic performance, infrastructure quality and availability, labor force, demographics, and political and social risk.
Report Scope
• Analysis of defense industry market size from 2005 through 2010 and forecasts till 2016
• Analysis of defense budget allocation
• Benchmarking with key global markets
• Market opportunities
• Defense procurement dynamics
• Industry dynamics
• Market entry strategy
• Competitive landscape and strategic insights
• Business environment and country risk
Reasons To Buy
• Gain insight into the Greek defense industry with current, historic and forecast market values
• Gain insight into market opportunity and attractiveness
• Gain insight into industry procurement dynamics
• Gain insight into industry structure
• Gain insight into the regulations governing the Greek defense industry and the potential market entry strategies with an expert analysis of the competitive structure
• Identify top companies of the Greek defense industry along with profiles of all those companies
Contact us:
Reportstack http://www.reportstack.com/contact
twitter: http://twitter.com/reportstack
facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Reportstack/182382778485635
linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/company/reportstack
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)